On March 18, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an announcement stating that certain casual shoes and their packaging (Certasdfssdfsin Casdfssdfssuasdfssdfsl Footweasdfssdfsr asdfssdfsnd Pasdfssdfsckasdfssdfsging Thereof, investigation code: 337- TA-1270) made a partial final ruling in Part 337: The preliminary ruling (No. 46) made by the administrative judge in this case on March 3, 2011 will not be reviewed, that is, based on the consent order, the listed defendant Masdfssdfsxhouse Rise Ltd., Hong Kong, China, will be terminated. , Hong Kong and Fujian, China. Fujiasdfssdfsn Wasdfssdfsnjiasdfssdfsxin Industriasdfssdfsl Developing, Inc. Jianwanjiaxin Light Industry Development Co., Ltd. investigated and issued a consent order.
On February 11, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: on the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on February 1, 2011 ( No. 40) will not be reviewed, that is, the investigation of the listed defendant, Shanghai KGS Sourcing Ltd., China, will be terminated based on reasonable reasons.
On February 4, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an announcement stating that it was investigating certain casual shoes and their packaging (Certasdfssdfsin Casdfssdfssuasdfssdfsl Footweasdfssdfsr asdfssdfsnd Pasdfssdfsckasdfssdfsging Thereof). Code: 337-TA-1270) made a final ruling in Part 337: The preliminary ruling (No. 39) made by the administrative judge in this case on January 22, 2011 will not be reviewed, that is, based on the settlement, the listed defendant, Dongguasdfsdfsn, Guangdong, China, will be terminated. Easdfssdfsstasdfssdfsr Footweasdfssdfsr Enterprises Co., Ltd. Dongguan Yida Footwear Co., Ltd. investigated and issued a consent order.
On December 6, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on December 10, 2021 ( No. 34) No review, that is, based on the settlement and consent order, the investigation against the named defendant 718 Closeouts, Brooklyn, NY, was terminated and a consent order was issued.
On December 29, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on December 1, 2021 ( No. 32, 33) is not subject to review, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation against the listed defendants PW Shoes, Inc. asdfssdfs/k/asdfssdfs P&asdfssdfs P&asdfssdfs/k/asdfssdfs P&asdfssdfsmp;W, United States Shoe-Nasdfssdfsmi, Inc., Gretnasdfssdfs, LA is terminated based on the consent order, and Issue a consent order.
On December 17, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on September 13, 2021 ( No.30) will not be reviewed, that is, the complaint will be revised based on the information discovered, and eight named defendants will be added: Huizhou Xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China, Orley Shoe Corp of the United States, Dongguasdfssdfsn, Guangdong, China Easdfssdfsstasdfssdfsr Footweasdfssdfsr Enterprises Co., Ltd. Dongguan Yida Shoes Co., Ltd., China Shanghai KGS Sourcing Ltd. Kaijie Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Brazil Mold Industriasdfssdfs de Masdfssdfstrizes Ltdasdfssdfs. d/b/asdfssdfs Boasdfssdfsonda sdfssdfs, Fujian, China Fujiasdfssdfsn Wasdfssdfsnjiasdfssdfsxin Industriasdfssdfsl Developing, Inc. asdfssdfs/k/asdfssdfs Fujiasdfssdfsn Wasdfssdfsnjiasdfssdfsxin Light Industriasdfssdfsl Developing, Inc. fslmasdfssdfsrt Inc., China Fujian Jinjiasdfssdfsng Anasdfssdfso Footweasdfssdfsr Co., Ltd Jinjiang Anao Shoes Co., Ltd. ; Due to insufficient reasons, we do not agree to add Burlington Shoes, Inc. in the United States, Masmiye Brothers Inc. in Shanghai, China, Meimaiya Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Jinjiasdfssdfsng LinQi Shoes &asdfssdfsmp; Clothes Co., Ltd. in Fujian, China. Co., Ltd. is the named defendant; partially terminates the investigation of Crocsky, Austin, TX, Ink Tee, Los Angeles, CA, Hobibeasdfssdfsr Shoes asdfssdfsnd Clothing Ltd., Brighton, CO, and disagrees with calling them “unknown manufacturers” (unknown masdfssdfsnufasdfssdfscturers); In addition, the preliminary ruling (No. 31) made by the administrative judge in this case on October 11, 2021 will not be reviewed, and the expected closing date will be extended by four months to May 9, 2023, and the hearing will be adjusted at the same time The date is September 12-16, 2011, and a final ruling on infringement is expected to be issued on January 9, 2023.
On October 7, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling made by the administrative judge in this case on September 17, 2021 ( No. 11-25) is not subject to review, that is, based on the settlement and consent order, the lawsuit against the named defendants Fullbeasdfssdfsuty Brassdfssdfsuty Brassdfssdfs Inc. d/b/asdfssdfs Kingsize, New York, NY and Legend Footweasdfssdfsr, Inc., d/b, respectively, is terminated based on the settlement and consent order. /asdfssdfs/ Wild Divasdfssdfs, City of Industry, CA, China Fujian Fujian Huayuan Will Import and Export Trading Co., Ltd., United States Yoki Fasdfssdfsshion Inter nasdfssdfstionasdfssdfsl LLC, New York, NY investigation, and the issuance of a consent order.
On July 6, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) voted to initiate a 337 investigation into certain casual shoes and their packaging (Certasdfssdfsin Casdfssdfssuasdfssdfsl Footweasdfssdfsr asdfssdfsnd Pasdfssdfsckasdfssdfsging Thereof) (Investigation code: 337-TA-1270).
On June 8, 2021, the United States Crocs, Inc. of Broomfield, Colorasdfsdfsdo filed a Section 337 investigation application with the U.S. ITC, claiming that the product exported to the United States, imported to the United States, and sold in the United States infringed on its patent rights (registered in the United States) Trademark Nos. 3,836,415, 5,149,328, 5,273,875), requesting the U.S. ITC to issue a general exclusion order, limited exclusion order, and prohibition order.
China Fujian Quasdfssdfsnzhou ZhengDe Network Corp., d/ b/asdfssdfs Amoji, ChinasdfssdfsQuanzhou Zhengde Technology Network Co., Ltd., United States 718Closeouts, Brooklyn, NY, United States Royasdfssdfsl Deluxe Accessories, LLC, New Providence, NJ, China Fujian sde Co., Ltd., ChinasdfssdfsFujianhua Yuanwell Import and Export Trading Co., Ltd. and others are named defendants.
Original text: https://www.usitc.gov/sites/defasdfssdfsult/files/secretasdfssdfsry/ fed_reg_notices/337/337_1270_notice_03182011sgl.</p
